Science, Ethics, and Public Policy," human embryonic stem cells are "a self-renewing cell line that gives rise to all cells and tissues of the body" Holland 3. Again, as has been noted above, significantly greater ethical dilemmas inhere to research with embryonic stem cells than to research with adult stem cells.
Another valuable benefit of embryonic stem cells is their ability to multiply readily and proliferate indefinitely when cultured in the proper conditions Devolder 9. These stem cells have been found all over the Embryonic stem cells, with their pluripotent potential and self-renewing quality, hold great value for scientific researchers in search of cures for untreatable diseases, progress in regenerative medicine, or a better understanding of early human development.
Scientists inject the embryo with sperm and after about four or five days it turns in to a blastocyst.
So the question is, why not set aside the research on embryonic stem cells, so that researchers can concentrate on adult stem cell research which has shown more promise? InPresident Bush declared that federal funding would be granted to human embryonic research on a restricted basis.
Following this executive order, Congress passed the Dickey Amendment inprohibiting "federally appropriated funds from being used for either the creation of human embryos for research purposes or for research in which a human embryo or embryos are destroyed, discarded, or knowingly subjected to risk of injury or death" Liu 2.
Supporters of embryonic stem cell research argue that the research is justified, though it requires the destruction of an embryo, because of the potential for developing cures and preventing unavoidable suffering. In a retroactive sense, this can cause us to question "what if the embryo that developed into Albert Einstein was destroyed for embryonic stem cell research?
There have been many untruths surrounding the experiments done with embryonic stem cells. Therefore, it could be suggested that anyone who has a real interest in seeing major medical breakthroughs happen which, presumably, would be almost everyone cannot afford to oppose the ongoing development of stem cell research per se.
There are, however, other options for those parents of embryos stored in fertility clinics, one of which is to donate the embryos to other couples struggling with infertility qtd. Scientists could then culture these stem cells by creating conditions that enable them to replicate many times in a petri dish without differentiating.
In order to find a cure for many different diseases and conditions scientists began studying embryonic stem cells.
One example is the previously stated method of using embryonic stem cells to repair damaged tissue or organs. Scientists can learn about these processes by studying stem cells that have been stimulated to differentiate into different types of body cells. The scientists then can, through a series of processes, treat the stem cells to develop into different types of tissue cells, muscle cells, nerve cells, and other various cells.
Is it morally acceptable to violate the rights of a human life for the for the sake of medical progress? Researchers also hope to use specialized cells to replace dysfunctional cells in the brain, spinal cord, pancreas, and other organs 2.
Ten Years of Controversy. With this in mind, embryonic stem cell research should receive greater government funding so that continued progress can be made. According to the Congressional Research Services Chart below, the amount of government funding given for embryonic stem cell research purposes for the fiscal years were limited.
Get your Research Topic Brief of words on your field of study in just business days including… An explanation why we choose this topic? If there were no God, then there would naturally be no problem with human beings pushing their knowledge to the limits.
A specific technique has been isolated to utilize stem cells in order to repair a damaged tissue or organ: Beliefs regarding the moral status of an embryo are subjective, and also their own controversial issue, which complicates the task of creating a universal law for the use of embryonic stem cells for research.
Arthur Caplan, professor of medical ethics at the University of Pennsylvania, asserts that "an embryo in a dish is more like a set of instructions or blueprint for a house.
All specialized cells arise originally from stem cells, and ultimately from a small number of embryonic cells that appear during the first few days of development.
The future life of said embryo is lost when the decision is made to not implant it. Bush approved federal funds usage for only a few stem cell lines that already existed. There are two main arguments surrounding the ethics of embryonic stem cell research: There is no question, they say, that even at the blastocyst stage a young human embryo is a form of human life.
Although motivated by good intentions, such procedures often involve actions of a morally questionable nature. When used for research, the scientists remove the stem cells from the inside of the blastocyst, which then destroys the embryo.
There are two different types of stem cell research in this debate. The area of stem cell research involving human embryonic stem cells is of particular interest in that embryonic stem cells are derived from week-old blastocysts developed from in vitro fertilized eggs.
Many liberals and conservatives alike argue that the potential benefits far outweigh the moral concerns, and for this reason, embryonic stem cell research should be pursued.
What are stem cells? If the federal government is to spend tax money on stem cell research, then this would likely contradict the values of many Americans, and especially conservative Americans, regarding the origins of human life. The only way to restore cellular function in an organ is to literally replace the lost cells and embryonic stem cells provide the best option for producing these cells 3.
The basic point here would be that human beings are engaging with a dangerous power that may be intimately connected with the very origins of life itself.
This, of course, is tied to broader political conflicts regarding issues such as religion and abortion.Feb 01, · So I would suggest a thesis like: Embryonic stem cell research is necessary for the development of new treatments for Parkinson's disease.
You would then need to focus the paper on the scientific reasons that require the use of embryonic stem cells for this wine-cloth.com: Resolved. There are many quarrels within this one area including “should stem cell research be federally funded”, “is embryonic stem cell research ethical”, and “is the outcome of stem cell research worth it”.
In this paper, I will establish what stem cells are and the difference between embryonic and adult stem cells; then I will evaluate the two main arguments in the embryonic stem cell research debate; and finally, I will analyze the ethics of these arguments to come to the conclusion that embryonic stem cell research is ethical under certain circumstances.
Discover two topic ideas for stem cell research paper along with some suggested thesis statement to help you in crafting A grade research papers on stem cell. Thesis Statement: This research paper presents a close look at stem cell wine-cloth.com writer explores both sides of the embryonic stem cells (a zygote formed by a single egg and a sperm) and adult stem cells (derived from human The public has to be educated with regards to the differences between embryonic and adult stem cell research.
The cell of the mouse at the base of the culture dish offers a sticky surface where they can attach. They also offer nutrients in to the culture medium.
Through the research, there has an innovation of growing without using mouse feeder cells embryonic stem cells.Download